Passer au contenu principal
Livraison rapide à 28$CA  La Terre est désormais notre seul actionnaire  
Lire notre Rapport d’avancement

Lire notre Rapport d’avancement

Notre Rapport d’avancement de 2025 explore toutes les nouvelles initiatives, parfois amusantes, parfois un peu étranges, que nous mettons en place pour réduire notre impact sur la Terre, notre unique actionnaire.

Découvrir

Livraison rapide à 22$CA

Livraison rapide à 22$CA

Les commandes sont expédiées dans un délai de 1 à 2 jours ouvrables et arrivent dans un délai de 3 à 5 jours ouvrables.

Les commandes sont emballées et expédiées dans un délai de 2 jours ouvrables. Les commandes passées pendant la fin de semaine ou les jours fériés sont traitées le jour ouvrable suivant.

En savoir plus

La Terre est désormais notre seul actionnaire

La Terre est désormais notre seul actionnaire

Si nous voulons préserver notre planète, sans parler de notre activité, nous devons tous agir dans la mesure de nos moyens. Voici ce que nous pouvons faire.

Lire la lettre d’Yvon

Renewable energy fight in CA spills over into BC

 /  2 mars 2009  /  Activism, Planet

BC Hydro MapI recently received an email about the proposal by Pacific Gas & Electric, the utility that powers most of Northern California, to amend the renewable energy bill now making its way through California's state legislature. I was surprised to hear it could further accelerate the development of hydropower in the province of British Columbia in Canada.

Environmental groups say PG&E is proposing amendments to the Senate version of the bill (SB 14) in order to import power from B.C. that would not only be cheaper, but would also be classified as “green.” When coupled with new state requirements to boost renewable energy, groups say this would further drive the recent “gold rush” for hydropower in the province (check out a map of current and proposed B.C. hydropower projects at http://www.ippwatch.info/w/).

The main two ways PG&E’s amendments to SB 14 would do this is by a) increasing the size of hydroprojects considered green and b) making a project eligible if it complies with the regulations of the “governing  jurisdiction.”

[Map courtesy Private Power Watch website.]

“This is problematic because California’s laws are stronger than BC's,” said Director of the California Hydropower Reform Coalition Keith Nakatani. “The current law is that out-of-state power must meet California regulations, so PG&E is trying to circumvent our law.”

The good news is that Hydropower Reform Coalition says there’s action we can take right now since there's a policy committee hearing on March 3.

They suggest contacting the author of SB 14, Senator Joseph Simitian, to make the following points:
Let them know that you oppose the PG&E amendments described above and understand PG&E has made several false claims:
1.  It isn't true that BC laws are stronger than in California.   
2. It isn't true that there will not be significant environmental impacts from BC hydro developments.
3. It isn't true that Canadian environmental groups do not oppose BC run-of-river hydro development.

Should you choose to call, ask to speak to (or leave a message with) his staffer, Kristin Stauffacher, at 1-916-651-4011.
It will also help to send her an email: kristin.stauffacher@sen.ca.gov.

Interested parties can also call Kellie Smith, Consultant on the Senate Energy, Utilities, and Communications Committee, at 1-916-651-4107, or kellie.smith@sen.ca.gov 

Patagonia Ironclad Guarantee Icon

Nous garantissons tous les produits que nous fabriquons.

Voir la Garantie Ironclad
Patagonia Ironclad Guarantee Icon

Nous assumons la responsabilité de notre impact.

Découvrir notre empreinte carbone
Patagonia Ironclad Guarantee Icon

Nous soutenons l'activisme de terrain.

Consulter Patagonia Action Works
Patagonia Ironclad Guarantee Icon

Nous reversons nos bénéfices à la planète.

Lire notre engagement
Recherches fréquentes